Skip to content Skip to sidebar Skip to footer

New realities
An ongoing update

Images today are no longer singular events, they function as a condition, an atmosphere, a continuous stream that shapes perception in real time. Within this stream, reality is not experienced as a stable external world, but as a constant update in the mind. One image replaces the next, the next displaces what came before. Seeing and recognizing barely conclude before they are overwritten.

Memory, under these conditions, becomes an unstable image, permanently layered over, continually interrupted. A recognized image doesn’t remain as a clear fragment. It persists as residue, an afterimage, a distortion. Reality is experienced as a retrospective montage, assembled from impressions that don’t originate solely in lived experience, but in distribution, repetition, and rhythm. Images don’t arrive simply to show something, they arrive to take up space. That occupation is double edged, it captivates and it numbs. It binds attention without producing understanding. For years, this has operated through a familiar oscillation, catastrophe images and images of a perfected world. Imminent collapse and seamless surfaces. A pendulum inside the feed that quiets the mind. No pause, no end, no distance. The result is a normalized, stable condition of passivity. Consume, move on, swipe again. In this passive mode, images are no longer examined, they are absorbed. They soothe by keeping the viewer occupied.

Photography, for all its manipulation, once carried a cultural logic of index and trace. The photographic image remained socially tethered to a procedure. Moment, exposure, imprint. That tether was never pure, it was already a construction framing, light, technical translation, post production, presentation. But even the constructed image retained a bond. It required effort. It had limits. A person had to produce it. A situation had to occur. Light had to touch film or sensor. With generative AI, that bond no longer holds. It is replaced by probability. Images are modeled as the most plausible result extracted from what has been learned. No longer imprint, but statistic. No longer event, but condensation. A new image type emerges that doesn’t document but normalizes. The probable is produced until it behaves like reality, until it becomes reality in circulation. This shift isn’t only about falsehood. It concerns trust as a structure. If any surface can be produced at photorealistic fidelity, doubt becomes the baseline. Not an active skepticism that verifies, but a diffuse uncertainty that relativizes everything. The problem isn’t the singular manipulative image. The problem is the condition in which every image is potentially manipulated and that potential alone is enough to erode the documentary assumption.

This mistrust extends beyond media critique. It reaches into the image memory itself. If images are continuously overwritten, the question shifts from the truth of what is seen to the truth of what is remembered. Is the image of the past a record, or a reconstruction, shaped by other images that have inserted themselves in between? Is memory still carried by experience, or has it already been standardized by the visual logic of the stream, by what has been seen often enough to register as “true” and “right”?

The present isn’t rich in image, but defined by them. Memory isn’t filled, but replaced. Reality isn’t lived, but assembled after the fact. Credibility no longer attaches to trace, but to probability. The crisis image and the perfected image operate as a machine of passivity. The real damage lies not in a spectacular fake, but in a generalized condition of mistrust that reaches into one’s own image memory.
In this condition, the lie doesn’t become stronger because it is perfected. It becomes stronger because it becomes inconspicuous. It blends in. It repeats. It becomes plausible and plausibility is enough to simulate truth.

Hubert Kaufmann, 2026